User:Cocomonster0o/Chromosome jumping/Yadi Huo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cocomonster0o


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cocomonster0o/Chromosome_jumping?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chromosome jumping

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is informative and is helpful for reader to understand the main clause, but is a little bit over-detailed. The detailed mechanism can be put in the content section. In addition, I recommend put the lead right below the title at the lead section instead of at the content section.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. However, I think the application section can be expanded a little bit more. And it'd be helpful and straight forward with picture showing the mechanisms or processes if an open resources can be found. But overall I think it's well-done.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral and not biased. It gives the advantage and disadvantage of the tool and the references are from reliable sources.

Sources and References

The sources are reliable and they all contents are referred back to the cited sources. But I think it'd be better to use some current sources to strengthen the article.

Overall Impression

The added content helps me understand the topic better and makes the article more complete. I'd suggest to expand the application section and maybe add a history or background section to emphasize the rationale behind it and the significance of the use of the chromosome jumping. And maybe add a bit more of the references to make the article more convincible. Overall, it's a well-written article.