User:Coconut818/Women in conservatism in the United States/Mem0207 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

@Gobears12 and @Coconut818


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coconut818/Women_in_conservatism_in_the_United_States?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Women in conservatism in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article’s overall status is very strong. It gives a detailed history of conservative women in the U.S., it is well-written, very well-sourced, and well-organized. The links all work properly and many of the sources are recent and up-to-date. The tone is neutral and informative. The drafts by @Gobears12 and @Coconut818 make valuable contributions to both the history and modern developments in the movement. I especially like the details about women in the JBS and the addition of a section on the Elevate PAC. My suggestions for improvements are below:


 * Add a section on Nikki Haley under “In 21st-century politics.” Just because she has not run for president yet does not mean she is not a prominent conservative woman on the national stage
 * Expand on what you mean by Amy Coney Barrett “leans more conservative.” In what ways? How have those views been expressed during her time as a judge and now justice? How do her views connect to / build upon those mentioned in the history section?
 * Consider moving the “Trump Era” and new “#MeToo movement” sections to under the “In the 21st century” header rather than under the “history” header. That is where I would expect to find that information.
 * Make sure to add a caption to the Amy Coney Barrett photo

With the drafted additions, I would say the article is approaching completeness. Some additions should be made (Nikki Haley, for example), but overall it addresses most relevant content. It is well-developed.