User:Coffee4564/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Jurisprudence

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this topic because it is relevant to law.

Evaluate the article
All of the headings to the article are relevant. Most of the articles are about people who founded law or created significant changes in law. None of the information seems obviously out of date as it is all historical. This article could possibly add more present-day and modern figures in law. The tone is neutral and is just informational in nature. The links added to the citation portion work and are from multiple countries. The sources that I checked appear to be from neutral backgrounds and not persuasive in nature. Numerous citations do not have links so the author should consider adding links if available so others can see them. The talk page has some very strong negative opinions about the article. Many people with higher knowledge pointed out that several significant figures of law are missing and several definitions need to be revised. Looking at sections in more detail certain people and significant actors are missing or have certain elements missing. The author should look into additional sources to revise the content.