User:CoffeeShopFantasy/Mycoplasma genitalium/Ae38798 Peer Review

Lead

- The lead in the actual article has a lot of information - maybe some of this could be divided into other sections in the article?

Content

- I think the information that you added to the sandbox will be super helpful for the article, especially the first sentence about structure. It seems like you have gathered new information on several aspects on the microorganism, so I am curious if the information will be added as a paragraph or in smaller blocks. There's already a lot on the page about the disease, so I think it was good that you focused new research on the pathogen.

Tone and balance

- There is no bias in the information added!

Sources and references

- I checked several of the references from the sandbox, and the links worked for me! They led to reliable sources.

Organization

- It looks like you have a bunch of awesome information to add! I'm curious where you are planning on putting this information in the actual article and what new sub-sections you will add.

Images and Media

- I think your article could benefit from some pictures or videos!

Overall impressions

- Overall, I think your group has an awesome start to your work! I think you have considered several aspects that are missing from the actual article!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)