User:Colindresj/Corrigedora (novel)/NoahMullens Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Colindresj
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Colindresj/Corrigedora (novel)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Make the first word the title
 * Mention more precisely the content, not just the setting (Kentucky)
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Mention briefly the critical response to the novel
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Break down then 3rd sentence

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * It is all relevant
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The only source is the novel so I do not know, but I think so
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Summary is missing
 * Make the subheadings under Themes a smaller font (I think?)

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:

Only really applicable to Themes section


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, I would just add sources under themes to back analysis
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * All the themes have the same amount of work done, so no.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * No, especially for words in "quotes"
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The only source is the novel, so not yet
 * Are the sources current?
 * The only source is the novel, so no
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The two links work, so yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, some sentences need to be rewritten for clarity or to be broken down, but it is mostly all clear
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, maybe critical response can also account for accolades, awards, or reception

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * No, there is only one sources
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * There is only one source
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Yes, it follows the pattern of most pages that are about specific novels
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * Yes, it will link to the author's page

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, it will largely improve information on the novel by moving it form a blurb in the authors page to an individual page
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The writing style, the information, the structure
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Filling it out, adding more sources