User:Coll1397/Lake stratification/Linneajohnston Peer Review

General info
I am reviewing Abel.jack03 and Coll1397's article about lake stratification.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Coll1397/Lake stratification
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Lake stratification

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content: I thought the content was appropriate, succinct, and well-cited. They included a lot of good examples for things that were in the original draft of the article, and I think this helped improve the legibility and flow of the original article.

Organization: I do feel like the article as a whole could've been organized better. There are only three sections, and I feel like some of the content of these sections could have been reorganized into smaller sub-sections. Just looking at a wall of paragraphs can be overwhelming and easy for the reader to get lost in, so by subdividing the sections into different ideas this could be mitigated.

Overall, I thought that the additions made to this article were well thought-out and well sourced. I think the information added helped my understanding of the topic, and the writing flowed well with the previous iteration of the article.