User:Colleennrenee/sandbox

After going through two articles, I had discovered a few of the excerpts inserted on the page were leaning more towards a bias perspective on immigration reform, and DACA. After analyzing the content on each article I had realized there were about two sections in each article that seemed over represented in some areas, but the had an intimidate switch to unrepresentative regarding specific details in each of the main events occurring today with bills being passed. In the DACA article I did not catch any paraphrasing and or citation errors, all the links seemed to be active as far as I could see. This did apply to immigration reform as well, all of the links were still active. In the article Immigration reform I found under the title "Effects on the US Economy", the examples used were bias leaning more towards the negative sides of immigration reform rather than having a reflection on both sides of the issue to address it in full throttle. In the article on "DACA" I found that underneath "effects" it had a very strong opinion stating that "DACA had no significant effects on the likelihood of attending school"--I found that this statement in itself really put a halt to my reading and had me questioning the overall credibility of this source.