User:Collinbivins/He Stayed for Breakfast/Ninastuder Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

I'm Ninastuder reviewing Collin Bivin's article


 * 1) The plot summary was just a little vague, but I was definitely still able to follow along to the basic movie plot. At the end of the plot section there was a little but that I think would fit better in the Reception Section.
 * 2) yes there are internal links for the main cast members along with basic word like Paris, and communist as well as newspapers like Los Angeles Times and Variety.
 * 3) There are quotes in the Reception section from the two referenced newspapers but there are no connecting citations.
 * 4) There are a few wording errors like in the sentence about Paul being discovered by Marianne's husband so just make sure you're re-reading super carefully so you catch it before publishing it.
 * 5) Citations are super important so make sure you include those in the Reference section and put/connect the citation at the end of the quote that you include.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)