User:Coloradogal1440/Rainbow Coalition (Fred Hampton)/Augiestudent.24 Peer Review

General info
Coloradogal1440
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Coloradogal1440/Rainbow Coalition (Fred Hampton)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rainbow Coalition (Fred Hampton)
 * Rainbow Coalition (Fred Hampton)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Is the content added relevant to the topic?

- Yes! There was information added to the "Legacy" section about Harold Washington. I believe noting that the rainbow coalition was a precursor for the multicultural coalition that both Barack Obama and Harold Washington used in their election campaigns helps readers understand its importance.

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

- The lead is a bit long. I noticed there were no huge changes made to the lead, and I think there could be. I would suggest shortening the lead especially since you took out the "Historical" section.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

- No! You guys did a great job of making sure that the information you added didn't contain any grammatical or spelling errors. I also appreciated the time you took to fix any grammatical and spelling errors from the original article. Overall, the article was clear and easy to read.

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

- When looking at the sources you had listed they seemed to be reliable secondary sources!

Is the content added well-written - i.e. is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

- The edits that I noticed were very well written. The changes made were easy to understand and didn't contain any grammatical errors. I do think that changes could be made to certain sections --- The lead contained a lot of information, so I think making that section more clear and concise would make the paper much easier to read overall!

Great job!!