User:ColtFite/Waterfowl hunting/Jwerry97 Peer Review

General info
ColtFite
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Waterfowl hunting - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Waterfowl hunting - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Article is well written detail is defiantly there does a good job explaining to me something that I knew nothing about. The pictures are well spread out and add meaningful context to the sections that they are placed in. The article tone is neutral I didn't really detect any noticeable bias this article aims to inform and doesn't give any unnecessary bias. The article is well organized as far as I could tell had no problems going through it and understanding what was going on.