User:Compend/Put volume instead of mass by dividing the whole equation by density in theory of relativity since infinity of mass seems not to be possible

In my view mass infinity cannot be possible,but volume infinity can be possible,since in theory of relativity it has been proved that mass can be converted into energy and becomes infinite but it does not makes any sense because if an object gets an infinite mass then its weight should also be infinite ,however considering that this has not been practically proved that an object gets an infinite mass but it has been proved that when a particle attains the relativistic velocity somehow its increase in mass can be observed so there should be an increase in weight as well which should not be negligible.AND how it is accepted that when the particle comes to rest after being in motion it gains its real mass.Mass is not increased but actually the density is decreased so much that volume becomes infinite. since (vol.=mass/density).IN MY VIEW IF YOU JUST DIVIDE THE EQUATION OF RELATIVITY OF MASS BY DENSITY ,THE MASS BECOMES VOLUME, WHICH IN MY VIEW CAN BE INFINITE SINCE IT IS JUST THE SPACE OCCUPIED BY A MASS. IN MY VIEW ACTUALLY DUE TO GREAT INCREASE IN SPEED OF PARTICLE THE SUB PARTICLES OF THAT PARTICULAR PARTICLE TRY TO MOVE AWAY FROM EACH OTHER AND THE VOLUME IS INCREASED AND WHEN PARTICLE COMES TO REST IT AGAIN ATTAINS ITS ORIGINAL VOLUME. MASS IN MOTION/DENSITY=(ACTUAL MASS/(1-V2/C2)1/2)/DENSITY = VOLUME IN MOTION=VOLUME/(1-V2/C2)1/2 SINCE THIS EQUATION OF RELATIVITY OF MASS, MASS INCREASED BY INCREASE IN VELOCITY,THEN IS CONVERTED INTO ENERGY OR ANY OTHER FORM WHICH CANNOT BE OBSERVED BY DECREASE IN VELOCITY CONSIDERING E=mc2 & Exc2.AND IF NOT CONVERTED INTO ENERGY THEN WHERE DID IT GO AND IN WHICH FORM."IF MASS IS INCREASED BY THE INCREASE IN VELOCITY THEN WHY THERE IS A DECREASE IN LENGTH OF THE OBJECT BY THE INCREASE IN VELOCITY,ACCORDING RELATIVITY THEORY OF MOTION."HOW CAN A MASS INCREASE IN WHICH THERE IS NO INCREASE OF NUMBER OF MOLES OR THE NUMBER OF PARTICLES OR NO INCREASE IN MOLECULAR/ATOMIC MASS OR ALBERT EINSTEIN WANTED TO SAY THAT AVOGADRO,S CONSTANT. CHANGES WHEN OBJECT IS IN MOTION.IF BY GAINING ENERGY MASS CAN INCREASE THEN AN OBJECT PLACED AT A GREAT HEIGHT SHOULD HAVE A GREATER MASS SINCE IT GAINS GOOD AMOUNT OF POTENTIAL ENERGY AND IT IS AT REST THEN WHAT ABOUT SPEED OF THE OBJECT.IN E=mc2 EINSTEIN HAS NOT GIVEN WHICH TYPE OF ENERGY IN WHICH AN OBJECT WILL BE CONVERTED,AND "IF BY FOCUSING THE ENERGY TO SINGLE MASS,A MASS COULD BE INCREASED THEN WHAT ABOUT THE HEAT ENERGY GIVEN TO WATER IN ISOLATED SUPPLY OF OXYGEN WHERE HEAT IS ONLY TRANSFERRED TO WATER AND THERE IS NO HEAT LOSS AND NO CHANCE OF LOSS OF WATER THROUGH EVAPORATION OR BOILING ,WHETHER MASS OF WATER WILL INCREASE OR NOT? SO THAT WE MAY CONCLUDE THAT ENERGY CAN BE CONVERTED INTO MASS."THERE ARE NO SOLID EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FOR THESE THEORIES OF RELATIVITY.NOW I AM PUTTING HERE TWO ARTICLES WHICH SHOW THAT THERE ARE NO SOLID RESULTS FOR THEORY OF RELATIVITY AND THIS IDEA OF INCREASE IN MASS SPECIALLY IS JUST BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS WHICH IS NOT SCIENTIFICALLY A BETTER WAY TO CARRY OUT A RESULT.

THE FIRST ARTICLE JUST NEGLECTS THIS THEORY OF RELATIVITY AND SAYS THAT ONLY RELATIVISTIC MASS CHANGES INTO ENERGY NOT THE INVARIANT MASS,WHILE THE SECOND ONE CONSIDERS AN EXPERIMENT OF CANNON BALL AND JUST ASSUMES THAT THERE IS EQUAL INCREASE IN MASS. SO ALL THIS IS BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS AND PAPER WORK.MY VIEW IS THAT BY CONSIDERING VOLUME INSTEAD OF MASS WOULD BE A BETTER OPTION SINCE IN INCREASE IN VOLUME THERE IS NO INCREASE IN MOLECULAR MASS/ATOMIC MASS OR NUMBER OF PARTICLES OR CHANGE IN AVOGADRO,S CONSTANT,BUT IS JUST A INCREASE IN SPACE OCCUPIED BY THE OBJECT.IT ALSO CANCELS THE INVOLVEMENT OF WEIGHT IN OBJECT,S MOTION SINCE IT REMAINS CONSTANT.IN MY VIEW THE MASS REMAINS INVARIANT BUT IT IS THE VOLUME THAT CHANGES WITH SPEED.IF YOU GO WITH CALCULATIONS THEN WHAT ABOUT THE "COMPLEX AND IMAGINARY" NUMBERS IN MATHEMATICS DO THEY REALLY EXIST THE ANSWER IS NO.BUT THEY ARE AND CAN BE USED FOR COMPLETING OUR CALCULATIONS,SINCE IN SCIENCE YOU HAVE AND YOU SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST ANY EXAMPLE BUT THAT SHOULD NOT BE BASED ON REMOTE ASSUMPTIONS. ONCE A MAN ASKED FROM A GREAT GREAT SCHOLAR THAT CAN GOD PACK THE WHOLE UNIVERSE INTO AN EGG,SO THAT NEITHER EGG SHOULD BECOME LARGER NOR SHOULD THE UNIVERSE BECOME SMALLER, HE REPLIED "YES"HE ASKED ANY EXAMPLE THE SCHOLAR REPLIED THE EYE BALL.SO MY ACTUAL PURPOSE TO SHARE THIS EXAMPLE WITH YOU WAS THAT EVERY THING THAT CAN OCCUR IN THIS UNIVERSE SHOULD HAVE RELIABLE EXAMPLE TO BELIEVE.IN PHYSICS IT IS THERE THAT MOVEMENT OF EARTH IN ITS ORBIT IS IN NON-INERTIAL FRAME OF REFERENCE BUT WE TAKE IT OR ASSUME IT TO BE IN INERTIAL FRAME, THIS THING WE CAN ASSUME SINCE WE KNOW ABOUT THE ACTUAL MOTION, BUT ASSUMPTION IN WHICH THERE IS ONLY ASSUMPTION CAN BE DANGEROUS FOR THE FUTURE PHYSICS.BY E=mc^2 MASS CAN BE CONVERTED INTO ENERGY SINCE A SPECIAL MASS IS CONSTANT THEN ENERGY WILL ALSO BE CONSTANT YOU CANNOT SAY THAT WHEN MASS WILL CHANGE INTO ENERGY IT WILL BECOME INFINITE,SINCE A PARTICULAR MASS WILL PRODUCE A PARTICULAR AMOUNT OF ENERGY AND IF YOU SAY THAT THAT PARTICULAR ENERGY CAN MIX WITH OTHER ENERGIES I WOULD SAY THAT IT WILL BE IMPURITY TO THAT PARTICULAR ENERGY SO THE MASS CANNOT BE INFINITE PROVIDED THAT NO IMPURITY IS ADDED TO THE ENERGY,YES YOU CAN SAY THAT THE VOLUME WILL BE INFINITE SINCE IT IS JUST THE SPACE OCCUPIED BY A MASS.IF OBJECT IS NOT IN MOTION AND AT REST THEN WE SHOULD NOT MULTIPLY IT BY THE SPEED OF THE SQUARE OF THE LIGHT TO CALCULATE ITS ENERGY.i.e.E=MoC^2,SINCE IT IS NOT MOVING WITH THE SPEED OF LIGHT.AND ENERGY OF MASS AT REST SHOULD BE EQUAL TO ITS POTENTIAL ENERGY.AND CONSIDERING LIGHT AS A PARTICLE .i.e.PHOTONS,WHY THE MASS AND ENERGY OF LIGHT IS NOT INFINITE, IF PHOTON IS A PARTICLE THEN ITS REST MASS SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED=0, IF=0 THEN IT SEEMS THAT IT DOES NOT EXIST.AND WHAT ABOUT THE X-RAYS THEY ARE THE ENERGY AND THEY MOVE WITH THE SPEED OF LIGHT IN VACUUM(ALL ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES MOVE AT SAME SPEED IN SAME MEDIUM),THEN WHY THAT ENERGY WHICH THEY POSSESS IS NOT INFINITE,AND IF ITS ENERGY WILL BE INFINITE IT HAS BEEN PRACTICALLY PROVED BY MODERN PHYSICS THAT ENERGY CAN BE CONVERTED INTO MASS AND IF YOU COVERT THAT INFINITE ENERGY OF X-RAYS INTO INFINITE MASS, THEN CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO ITS WEIGHT?.HOW CAN THE SPEED OF AN ENERGY BE CALCULATED.AND IF ANYTHING IS CONVERTED INTO ENERGY BEFORE ACHIEVING THE SPEED OF LIGHT, THEN WHY SHOULD ITS ENERGY BE CALCULATED BY MULTIPLYING IT BY THE sq. OF SPEED OF LIGHT.ITS ENERGY SHOULD BE CALCULATED BY ITS ACTUAL SPEED.IF YOU SAY THAT E/c^2=m ,THEN E=Mc^2 ,THEN WE SHOULD KNOW THAT SINCE ENERGY HAS NO SPEED SO IT CAN DIVIDED BY A CONSTANT BUT MASS CAN ATTAIN VARIABLE SPEEDS.HOW CAN MOMENTUM OF A BODY CAN BE CALCULATED SINCE ITS MASS OR INCREASE IN MASS IS NOT KNOWN?. BY: M.SADIQ ALVI STARTING DATE:14th NOV. 2009