User:ConnerSauve/Evaluate an Article

Beaux-Arts architecture
(Provide a link to the article here.)

== I have decided to evaluate this article because I am an architecture student, this is my favourite type of architecture and I come from a french background. My first impression was positive, it was easy to read with enough information, I enjoy the history and training sections. ==

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== The leading section was to the point with an appealing brief description of the main topic. For the content, all the information was relative to the topic, it seemed to be all up to date and found it useful to see the bigger picture of the architecture due to it being world wide seeing the connections from country to country and even continent to continent. The content was fairly balanced with no persuasion making the reader think differently about the architecture itself, it would be nice for more information on some countries and continents but it was overall pretty informational. As for the sources, they do work, they could use a few more updated references because the last one was in 2019, it would be nice to keep it up to date with new findings, the sources that currently are there are good sources and good to read along with this page. The writing was simple to read and concise, it was organized and easy to access the different topics and the topics weren't broad with the major topics having sub topics. The images use are very good, they are nice examples are the sources under some of them lead to a nice reading, some of the layouts could have been better for more visual appeal or even as a timeline. Overall the article was enjoyable, an easy, informational reading, with nice examples to support it, it could use some more information about the architecture in each country or continent but other than that there are no complaints. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)