User:ConnorChisholm/Evaluate an Article

James McHenry Jones

 * Name of article: James McHenry Jones
 * I have chosen this article about our James McHenry Jones recuse he is a very interesting man, And a business and Education man to.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? : Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? : yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? : No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? : Yes

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?: Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?: Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?: No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?: Sort of hes not a very talked about individual.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?: Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?: No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? : No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, they have many articles linked and cite there sources well
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?: yes
 * Are the sources current?: Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?: yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?: Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?: Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?: yes, a few
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?: Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?: Yes
 * Are images well-captioned?: Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?: Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?: a bit

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?: Not much
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?: Yes rated very well, he is listed on the business category.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?: Not Much but we haven't exactly talked about him specifically

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Good
 * What are the article's strengths? Its well cited and up to date; its direct and accurate about his life.
 * How can the article be improved?: more information that's accurate could always make it feel more complete as an article.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?: well developed and complete to best of its ability.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: