User:ConnorReidVinson/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Media Bias
 * This article is too wordy in some areas, specifically discussing scholarly treatment of media bias. In the talk page their is some issues with this section specifically, and also a box suggesting it be reorganized to comply with the layout guidelines. This topic is pretty relevant today, but the article itself needs some revision. This article has a class C rating.
 * There are 87 listed sources and many are scholarly articles or journal entries. The biggest issue with this article is layout and wording.
 * There are 87 listed sources and many are scholarly articles or journal entries. The biggest issue with this article is layout and wording.
 * There are 87 listed sources and many are scholarly articles or journal entries. The biggest issue with this article is layout and wording.

Option 2

 *  Photographic Film 
 * This article starts out strong, offering a description of photographic film and its history, but the structure doesn't flow. The description and mechanics should, in my opinion, should switch places with the history and evolution of film. Also, discussing it's decline and renewed interest seems pointless. There isn't enough written material under these sections either.
 * There is some discussion in the talk section regarding bias and citations, and a heading asking for sources to be provided too. This article has a class C rating.
 * There is some discussion in the talk section regarding bias and citations, and a heading asking for sources to be provided too. This article has a class C rating.
 * There is some discussion in the talk section regarding bias and citations, and a heading asking for sources to be provided too. This article has a class C rating.

Option 3

 * Japanese Art
 * I have always been a fan of Japanese art, so this article was something I had to look into. The layout is good and descriptive, but the biggest issue is sources. There are many references without sufficient citations or sources.