User:Conradfrench/Environmental politics/Katieebinger Peer Review

Great addition to this article!

A few notes:

The article read a little too much like your opinion. I think in places where you are saying x "seems like" y, it would be helpful to have a little more info about how you are getting that conclusion. The first few paragraphs kind of read as if you are bringing in logic, then saying, but empirical evidence suggests something else, which I love for a paper, but doesn't really fit with the Wiki style here. I think if you addressed those two points that it would be a much more balanced article.

I really like the last paragraph that calls out the additional consideration needed for EJ policies, and I think this addresses the Wiki "equity gaps" well.

Great sources! It's clear you did some quality research to write this summary.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)