User:Contrerasbri/Ni una menos/Fukaohashi Peer Review

Wiki Peer Feedback Form

Name of Reviewer: Fuka Ohashi

Name of Person you are reviewing: Briana Contreras Cortes (User:Contrerasbri)

Is there a strong opening sentence or phrase?


 * The strong opening sentence or phrase in this text is "Historically, Mexico has been a country with one of the highest femicide rates in Latin America." This opening sentence is powerful because it immediately sets the tone for the discussion by highlighting a critical and alarming issue – the high femicide rates in Mexico.

Is there sufficient attention to the larger historical, cultural, or geographic context?


 * It gives attention to the larger historical, cultural, and geographic context, particularly focusing on the issue of femicide in Mexico and its broader implications in Latin America. The strong opening sentence highlighting Mexico's historical struggle with one of the highest femicide rates in Latin America sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the issue.

Is there a broad framing of the topic and attention to other related Wikipedia pages?


 * It exhibits a broad framing of the topic by exploring the issue of femicide in Mexico within the wider context of Latin America. It not only delves into the historical and current challenges faced by Mexico but also connects these issues to broader regional movements.

Is there a strong organization and structure of the wiki?


 * It demonstrates a strong organization and structure by presenting a coherent narrative that follows a logical flow. It begins with a focused discussion on the historical femicide rates in Mexico, providing specific data and context. The introduction of the NiUnaMenos movement follows seamlessly, connecting the broader issue of femicide to a specific initiative.

Are there a range of substantive and high-quality sources?


 * It draws from a range of substantive and high-quality sources, enhancing the credibility and depth of the content. It incorporates statistical data to support its claims, such as the 135% increase in femicide in Mexico from 2015-2021.

Do these sources work well together to illuminate a topic in compelling ways?


 * The sources in the wiki work exceptionally well together to provide a comprehensive and compelling illumination of the topic. By weaving together historical data, such as the alarming increase in femicide rates in Mexico from 2015-2021, with impactful events like the Ni Una Menos nationwide strike on March 9, 2020, the article establishes a strong foundation.

Is there any biased language?


 * No, the author remains neutral.

Any feedback on grammar and style?


 * The grammar and style are clear and concise.

Is the language clear, accessible, and impartial?


 * The language is clear, accessible and impartial.

Are there visual materials?


 * Consider adding some of the pics

Any other suggestions?


 * N/A

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)