User:Contrerasbri/Ni una menos/Madisonave12 Peer Review

General info
@Contrerasbri
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:Contrerasbri/Ni una menos
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Ni una menos

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Is there sufficient attention to the larger historical, cultural, or geographic context  Yes, in the Lead the author introduces Mexico and the femicide rates that have been present there over the last seven years.
 * 2) Is there a broad framing of the topic and attention to other related Wikipedia pages?  I do believe that there is a broad framing of the topic, but not so much attention to other related Wikipedia pages. I suggest hyperlinking a few related Wikipedia pages to show your content is interconnected with other topics.
 * 3) Is there a strong organization and structure of the wiki?  Yes, there is a strong organization and structure of the Wikipedia page. Very clear and easy to read.
 * 4) Are there a range of substantive and high quality sources?  There are a total of five sources. Again, I suggest maybe going back and hyperlinking 2-5 other Wikipedia pages that relate to this topic (just to increase your credibility).
 * 5) Do these sources work well together to illuminate a topic in compelling ways?  Yes, the five sources that are mentioned work well together to illuminate the topic.
 * 6) Is there any biased language?  No, none that I saw.
 * 7) Any feedback on grammar and style? Is the language clear, accessible, and impartial?  Nope, none.
 * 8) Are there visual materials?  No, maybe add one photo?