User:Cook.tanner/Pickathon/Stardiff9 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (cook.tanner)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cook.tanner/Pickathon

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes the opening sentence explains a brief about the pickathon.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No it doesn't explain the timeline on the pickathon.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No it is a bit under detailed.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The part that says "Unlike many other successful music festivals" doesn't need to be in there.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? There was a few places it seemed not too natural, but for the most part it was.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes in which I stated above it says "Unlike many other successful music festivals".
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The idea of the pickathon, and what it has to offer is a little underrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Only in a few parts, but the majority is good.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Some explain the time and who played at the pickathon, but not the idea of the pickathon as much.
 * Are the sources current? Not all of them, because there is a timeline, because they are from different times in the pickathon.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Easy to read. Could be organized a little better.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I didn't see any spelling errors. I did notice that the number 2 and 6 weren't spelled out in the sentence. Typically they need to be spelled out.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned? No photos.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Overall the article had a great idea, I really look forward to learning more about pickathons, because they seen quite interesting. I think there should be more information on the idea of it though, rather than just a timeline. Off to a great start.