User:CoolCat130/Claudia Bouvette/Tabeabenlakehal Peer Review

General info
CoolCat130
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CoolCat130/Claudia_Bouvette?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead review
- Clear, concise and straightforward lead. Perhaps add where the artist is currently based at along her childhood city that is mentioned.

- Lead does include artist's status in the industry, but could benefit of including other major sections's brief details alongside the mention of her two albums.

- Lead is up to date with recent status of artist, while including past roles in industry.

- Article does not include subject matters that are not mentioned later one.

Content review
- The content in the article draft is up to date, from childhood involvement in music to current moments within music and TV.

- The information is not overly descriptive either, but enough insight for full details is provided to understand the artist better, from different parts of the artist's career.

Tone and Balance review
- The content is indeed neutral. It offers descriptive information on projects that the artist partook in her career and notable musical artistry with facts and sources.

- The bibliography of Claudia Bouvette does not encourage the reader to form any opinion on the artist. It informs the reader of the artist's main path in the industry and highlights major events.

Sources and References review
- Articles have a mix of official interviews from the artist themselves as well as giving information on professional projects.

- Most sites featured in the references are from official magazines and news outlets which confirm status of the person and thus the article as well.

- Discography is neatly done and full looking. 23 sites are used, which is more than enough. Websites do date from recent years and older ones, providing a mix of both.

- Links are indeed functional.

Organization review
- Information in the draft article is clear with straightforward words and facts.

- The article is broken down in essential categories such as a section for the artist's upcoming and childhood as well as career in TV and music about her professional projects. The discrography at the end is notably neatly executed and show a good mastering of Wikipedia's tables.

- One sentence a bit confusing, perhaps re-word more clearly: Bouvette has explained that coming home from Mixmania 2 was a difficult experience, influenced by her expulsion from her music program in secondary 4.

* I'm understanding that she got an expulsion when she got back, but why, how come?

- Slight review to be made for sentence structure (ex: Wonderland magazine called [the or her] single Douchebag...)

Images and Media review
- Image used contains an appropriate caption and is sourced.

- Visual image shows the artist in her element well, but just a suggestion to pick a photo where Claudia Bouvette's face is more visible.

For New Articles Only review
- Claudia Bouvette is included in Mixmania 2's Wikipedia page, but does not have her own page yet.

- The list of sources count 23 of them. It included a variety from interviews to news outlets and magazines.

- Headings and infoboxes are adeptly featured.

Overall Impressions review
- The featured content, from "Life and career", "Musical style and artistry" and Bouvette's Discography are all necessary topics that are included.

- The extended and organized discography tables are definitely a strength of the article.

- Doing a review for any structure and grammar to ensure no errors and fluid reading.