User:Coolnuclear/Nuclear power in the United Arab Emirates/Whenbofa Peer Review

Lead

The lead has not been edited, does not require any edits

Yes, the lead is finished previously

Content

Yes, the content is relevant and up to date. The content added is important to the topic and fits. There is little to no content which is out of place. There is no equity gaps. The additions made by the author define some things which may not need to be defined which makes the additions longer.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral. There is no bias

Sources.

The sources are valid and through. All sourcing matches the links and where they are placed is good. Both sources come from reliable data collecting organizations.

Organization

The topics added are well organized. They struggle to be concise throughout the entire addition adding definitions which may not be required.

Images NA

Overall Impression

The addition of this topic to the article is important as nuclear decommissioning processes are always overlooked as they may not be flashy. Nuclear decommissioning is very important, therefor it should be public and easily accessible info

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)