User:Cooper Justin/Computer and Video Games/Alex Alcott Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Peer review: Alexander Alcott's peer review of Cooper Justin's work on article Computer and Video Games
I am reviewing Cooper Justin's work on an article Computer and Video Games. The article is about explain the history of the magazine, website, and YouTube channel and what they did. But after that I didn't really find much else. The history in my opinion is very good and if someone want's to learn when the company was made and what it did, they would find some good information.

I have some ideas on what to add to this article. My first idea is after the history, try and talk about anything drastic that happened to the company. Did they go through any controversies while they were still around? was there any competition with any other company's later on? Another idea is have some examples for some of the things talked about. Talk about some big games the magazines or website would talk about and add the kind of cheats that the company would show to anyone interested.

You want to catch people's eyes, especially the ones who are a big fan of video games. I'm a big fan of video games so when looking at an article like this I would be interested to see how the company came to be and a how it ended up falling. It would also be interesting to see if they kept going with magazines while having their website up. The article does have content that is up to date with reference added to help with their information. With organization, Everything is good and very clear to read with no grammatical errors. It has pictures of magazine covers, which shows what products were being made by the company. In conclusion, everything with the article is good but with some of the section I feel as if more information could be added to talk about more things.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Computer and Video Games

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?