User:CorenANIBot/Incidents/2008-1-7/Talk:James I of England and Us

Talk:James I of England and User:24.255.11.149
This user has repeatedly attacked editors most of the day. Many editors have removed his attacks and he has reverted them. I just removed a slew of them and he reverted me. I have removed them again and he has reverted again with a summary of "rvv". He's been warned numerous times (see his talk page history as he's removed them from his page). He was blocked on December 24th for the same issues and his talk page was protected because he continued the tirade and personal attacks there. -- ALLSTAR  echo 00:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Untrue; only his confederates have removed my comments, which address the infamy of the article because of his and his confederates' actions. I could have filed several RFCs and AN/Is, but I have chosen time after time to try communicating directly to the culprits about what is completely inappropriate about their activities that damage the viability and professional respectability of the Wikimedia Foundation.  I am Fidei Defensor with Wikipedia here.  Just because his friends have a mob mentality to push their POV and I don't work in concert with others who share my view, doesn't make his any more credible.  Remember what WP:NOT.  Oh and who's this sockpuppet?  Sticks and stones may break my bones, but memetic libel doesn't do any damned thing.  Besides, the editor here is purposefully throwing you a red herring straw man combo.  He is the one you should look out for.  I'm not going to tell you how, or to condemn him.  I just want reform.  He is as nasty as ever to the opposing party, just check the talk page.  24.255.11.149 (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * User has also broken 3RR. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't edit the damn articles! 24.255.11.149 (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3rr applies anywhere, including talk pages. Lawrence Cohen  00:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Blocked three times by three admins for 3rr violations and harassment before. Lawrence Cohen  00:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

A lot of wind. 24.255.11.149 (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The block logging for attacking other editors is a lot of wind? Lawrence Cohen  00:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * IP clearly has no understanding of WP:CIVIL and has violated the 3 revert rule several times. Should be blocked. Gromlakh (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I do all of it in a vacuum? No inciting attitudes of the very same vein from others? 24.255.11.149 (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

What, because I never file formal complaints, but try to settle it "out of court", nobody here will listen to me? I the initial plaintiff become officially the defendent? 24.255.11.149 (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Making personal attacks, repeatedly, and violating other policies such as 3RR will get you nowhere. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Disruptive single purpose editor. IP blocked for a month, up from a week last time. Sandstein (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)