User:Coreou/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Feminist anthropology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

As someone who studies anthropology as a part of my undergraduate studies, I chose to evaluate this article because many of the approaches to anthropology that I have been exposed to are based off the teachings of predominantly white and male anthropologist. This article matters because it highlights an entire subset of anthropology that is critical to understanding the field as the world and societies along with it progress. At first glance, this article appeared to be pulling from several different sources and did not take a certain stance on feminist anthropology, leading me to begin to believe that this is a fairly well developed article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section: This article's lead section clearly establishes the topic of the page and highlights the main sections that will be further developed in the article. There is no information in the lead section that is not present in the rest of the article. All this is done in a concise manner.

Content: The content in the article is accurate, pulled from several different sources, and up to date. The article specifically refers to Wikipedia's equity gaps by primarily discussing women, but also highlighting how the underrepresented population and identify of women intersects with other marginalized identities as well.

Tone and Balance: The article reads in a neutral manner without adding the author's perspective into the information that is presented. The viewpoints of several different anthropologist are presented, representing various viewpoints on feminist anthropology and illustrating the different ideologies that are held by anthropologists with regard to the topic.

Sources: The citations that were checked both worked and supported the claims presented in the article. The sources come from a diverse sampling of authors and those sources highlighting a specific anthropologist's view on feminist anthropology are clearly presented as that author's specific view on the topic, and are not presented as fact.

Talk page discussion: On the talk page, it becomes apparent that several editors have worked on the page, transforming it from an article about feminism in cultural anthropology to one about feminist anthropology as a whole. The article is a part of WikiProject Anthropology and was worked on through Wiki Education twice.