User:Corgiflash4!/Water extraction/Selenalam5 Peer Review

General info
Corgiflash4!
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Corgiflash4!/Water extraction:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Water extraction:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- After my first read you have a lot of good content that allows me as the reader to off bat know what I am reading, at any point I could stop but I would still have a good understanding of the topic

-I do think adding more citations would help with organizing your information and for people to see what information you have actually used

-I think the format is good, maybe adjust the headings and organize that a little bit better but other than that it follows the majority standards of a good Wikipedia article.

- If anything I would say your wording in certain paragraphs makes the article seem a little too informational or like you just copy and pasted a statistic or fact, I would say to make it more readable.

-I also like how you reference where each source and each piece of information when used but also to add the citing number when you put in you information.