User:Corgsi05/Chironex fleckeri/Chuckkillsbucks Peer Review

General info
Corgsi05
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Corgsi05/Chironex fleckeri:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Chironex fleckeri
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Chironex fleckeri

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hey there, Firstly I want to say you did a great job with the amount of detail and effort you out into your work. It shows you are knowledgeable and did extensive research on this topic. The biggest thing I noticed was there was only 2 articles present in the sandbox. I could be missing something, but please remember that it is a requirement to use 3 peer reviewed articles. It might be in your best interest to look for another one. Another potential thing to think about is the wordage used now and then. For example "Chironex fleckeri is best known for ..." While this may be true they are best known for their stinging that might not be true for everyone. In other words this is an opinion and you want to just stick to facts. Overall this was well written and I would not change the 2nd paragraph in the "sting" starting with "in Australia." This paragraph is well written and only on facts.