User:Corgsi05/Chironex fleckeri/Wildlife Nerd8694 Peer Review

General info
Corgsi05
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Corgsi05/Chironex fleckeri
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chironex fleckeri

Evaluate the drafted changes
Breakdown;

Description: what you add is really good information that keys in to an aspect of the species not previously mentioned in the wikipedia page, the only issues I see with the information is it formatting under "Description". You might want to make a subtitle or new section for the species "Diet" or even "Ecology". Also the wording of the two sentences don't flow as nicely as they can, understandably rewording the information already given without plagiarizing can come at this consequence.

Sting: Again, you add really essential information to the page about the species, there are just some nitpicky issues I'm going to point out. The last paragraph of information that you have included sounds more like information for their range/habitat/etc. instead of just added on info for "stings". It might prove effective to find peer-reviewed research articles specifically tackling treatments for such stings or maybe the chemical breakdown of the venom itself?

References: These are great references to have that include so much information, impressive to have found them when your species already has a decent amount written in the article. Peer-reviewed journal articles might help going forward.