User:Cosmo1836/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Design studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Chose it because it is directly related to my major in college. Design studies and practice is important in society and understanding the mechanics of it and how to pursue has major advantages. A first impression of the article would be that it is very thorough and detailed when it comes to all aspects relating the academics of design and how it changed and evolved over time.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Content:

The article overall has too much information, while the attention to detail and specifics is important, it does stray far from the main point intended. For example, the foundational figures part is too lengthy and not all historical figures are foundational, some are more recent and insignificant to the development of design studies than others.

Tone:

There is some bias regarding the perspective of where the information is coming from, there isn't enough variety and globalization in the information. The article doesn't provide enough of a global perspective.

Sources:

The links after previous editing seem to all work and the citations are all appropriate and connected to the topics discussed.

To conclude, the talk page was very beneficial and helped narrow down mistakes and errors and fix them in terms of content and sources