User:Cotec1/Indigenous decolonization/Katieestewart Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Cotec1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Indigenous decolonization

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead is very well done, concise and informative. It includes a clear description of what the article is about, and the "contents" include the article's major sections- including the section Chris added! The lead does include a lot of detail, but I don't think it is overly detailed and I feel that all the information included is necessary for a topic such as Indigenous Decolonization, as it is an important thing that has happened and is continuing to happen.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The content added is very relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. This section is really well done and provides another great section to the topic.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Throughout the paragraph added, the tone is quite neutral, but in saying that I would say to be a little careful about the wording of some sentences. Yes, this article is aiming in favour of one side over the other, but some sentences are written in almost an opinion based or essay style. Just remember to include that the things you are writing are from sources and fact based articles.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The information added is cited really well and the references that were added with this information are all reliable and they reflect the work added to this page.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content added is very well written, concise and easy to read. It is very well organized because from what I learned while reading this section that was added, it is a very important part to Indigenous Decolonization, so it's very well organized in the way that Food Sovereignty has it's own section and isn't just added to another one.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There is one image on this article, which was not added by Chris, but it is well cited and enhances the understanding of the topic.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
Not a new article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Overall, this article is very well written and the information that has been added by Chris is great and very useful towards the topic of the article. Just remember to keep this fact based and not in an essay style, but overall it's very well done!