User:Coth02/John of Głogów/Mlehn0002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Coth02


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coth02/John_of_G%C5%82og%C3%B3w?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * John of Głogów

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Doesn't seem like anything was manipulated nor changed from the lead, which I'm pretty sure is okay because you only need 500 words! But, the lead to your additional paragraph in your sandbox is good.

Content

The content is good! You just need more information since it's only about ~150 words, but you still have time until the due date so it's okay! But for your content right now, it seems relevant and you added something new that wasn't in the original article.

Tone and Balance

The content added is very neutral and it is not apparent that you "pick a side" or try to "persuade" the reader. It is factual, which is how it should be. No viewpoints are under nor over represented.

Sources and Resources

Looks like there are 2 sources, which is good for only ~150 words. Once you add more, or reach the 500 minimum, you should be on track for sources because the more the better. (Unless the sources are inappropriate). All the links work as well and the current sources look appropriate.

Organization

The small paragraph seems clear and concise. Also, just some spelling errors and grammar mistakes that need to be reviewed. Not clear if it'll be broken down into paragraphs with extension of information, or just let be.

Images and Media

None, but I don't think you need any.