User:CottonGold/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Psychology of religion)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I picked the article of "Psychology of Religion" because I found the title of the article intriguing, but also because the aspect of psychology and religion as two separate things sparks my interest as well.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section:

I did not find an introduction section to the article, however it directly starts with the history section of the article instead. Secondly, the article also gives a small overview of what is being discussed in the article which is great to know the contents of the text.

Content:

The content of the article was very strong and informative.

Tone and balance:

The tone and balance of the article were good as well, as for the viewpoints of the people in the article they were developed nicely and thoroughly also. I believe that the article kept a neutral tone and did not try to sway people in any way.

Sources and references:

I found the sources and references were used appropriately and pretty well done.

Organizations and writing quality:

The organization and writing quality of the article is pretty good if I say so. The article goes in depth about the history of the article as well as the people involved. As for spelling and grammar mistakes I myself did not find any throughout the article. Fourthly, I also like the fact of how the writers of the article broke down the article in different sections and also give the sections different headings, makes it a lot easier to understanding what you are reading.

Images and media:

I do believe that the pictures in this article goes well with the article. However, there is only one picture, which shows all the males that were involved in the discussion of the article, but did not necessarily write the article themselves. Secondly, I also believe that the use of more pictures in this article would have further improved the writing on a more visual sense, because having more than one picture illustrates a more interactive way of learning and being involved with the article. Thirdly. I do believe that the picture being used in this article adheres to the right copyright regulations and also uses the right citations as well. As for if the picture is being used in a visually appealing way I would say yes it is, however the position of the picture could have been better.

Talk page discussion:

I was not able to find the talking page.

Over all impressions:

The article was pretty well written, however, I personally would have liked to see a bit more pictures since I am more of a visual learner. Although, the materials being used in the article of "Psychology of Religion" was pretty informative and I did in fact learn a lot of new things, which was intriguing.