User:Coulisz/Conservation of fungi/Mcking24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Zach Coulis


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coulisz/Conservation_of_fungi?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Conservation of fungi

Lead
The lead is concise and provides a good introduction to the topic. The information provided gives context to the topic of conservation of fungi. The lead also includes information from sections on conservation, though does lack any context from the ecosystem services section.

Content
The content added is up-to-date and is relevant to the topic. The content added also gives context for importance of conservation of fungi and good explanations for the reader.

Tone and Balance
The information added contains a neutral tone and does not persuade the reader towards a certain viewpoint. It present facts and information meant to educate without persuasion or bias.

Sources and References
The articles used as source and reference material are good sources that make the information provided valid and beneficial to the article. They appear current, and provide information relevant to the topic.

Organization
All information added is concise and relevant with clear organization and structure to the article. It reads easily, utilizing hyperlinks and sectioning well to divide up information and topics.

Overall Impressions
The article draft is very well-written, utilizes good sources, and provides important and relevant information to the topic. The Wikipedia article benefits from these additions and should be added to the live article.

Potential Source
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/4/2038