User:Court.pow2/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Draft:Péter Virágvölgyi

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am interested in all visual arts. This article is on a man who was a graphic designer. I decided on this specific graphic design article because the author of it chose to include useful images of the designer's work.

Evaluate the article
To begin, the lead section is very well done. It is short and to the point. It gives the basic information about the graphic designer and briefly previews the information later written about in the rest of the Wikipedia article. Next for the content, it is all relevant to the topic at hand. It was also updated on December 21, 2020, so it is up to date information. As for information missing, I believe this article could use more specific information on the artist's other works. It has a section specifically on his Italic handwriting, but not on his other contribution to the visual arts. This article's topic is one that is probably more obscure because the artist is Hungarian, so it also provided information on something less represented. When looking at the tone and balance, we see that the author of this article stays very neutral and doesn't attempt to persuade at all. With the resources, the author pulled from many different ones. They used a book, documentary, and a few articles. These all have various publication dates, but is still the most current information because this artist died in 1998. There are limited sources used however, and it seems that the author mainly pulled information from the video and the book (given that the articles don't provide much information about this artist). Nevertheless, after doing some more research, those two sources seem to be the best to use information from. Then, the organization and writing quality were both very good. This article was easy to read and didn't seem to have any grammatical errors. With images and media, there are four pictures of his artwork and books provided. These help to show what different kinds of artwork he did and his books. It would have been helpful, though, for a picture of the artist himself to be present in the article. Plus, after looking into these images, I see that they all adhere to the copyright regulations. For the talk page discussions, there are not any currently. Finally, my overall impression was that it is a good, neutral, informative article. However, it needs more time put into it and more information added about this artist and his artwork.