User:Court.pow2/Memphis College of Art/AlexisRosendahl Peer Review

I think the article is very well written and flows nicely. I like that you included so much about how the college played a part in the community! The article is balanced even though the history section is bigger than the others, because there is more history than current news on the subject matter.

The article appears neutral. The only thing I would change is the word “unique.” It appears twice in the article, once in the lead section and once in the MCA Events section. I would maybe say “set it apart” or something of that nature so that it appears to be more neutral. Other than that, it looks great as far as neutrality goes!

All viewpoints are represented. The article gives a nice overview of the college without speaking from a specific viewpoint.

I see you used a variety of sources, and I did notice that some of them are repeated under the reference section. #2 and #5 lead to the same source, as well as #3 and #6. I know if you go to cite a source that has already been used in the text you can just go to “re-use” under the cite tool.

I see you have at least one source to support each section of the article. I imagine there aren’t a ton of sources available on this topic since the college shut down last year. :( One of the sources appeared to be a website on one of the former students, and although the page was extremely biased, you pulled out the neutral facts, so I think it works.

I really like the notable alumni list! It helps break up the article a little bit and allows readers to delve into the Wiki pages for Memphis artists!

Everything is updated to the fullest extent with the school having shut down, so I think this is all the information necessary for the article!

Note:

·      In the history section it says, “However, before being becoming an independent college.”

Peer Review Response
Thank you so much for your great feedback! It has been very helpful in my editing. I made sure to change all of the areas you pointed out as not neutral. Also, thank you for the tip on how to re-use citations. I went back and changed those to be re-used ones. I'm also glad that you found and pointed out my mistake of writing "before being becoming." I located it in the article and made sure to change it. Again, thank you so much for your amazing feedback. I'm glad you were honest and shared what you liked and what you thought should be altered to improve the article.