User:Court.pow2/Memphis College of Art/Katien13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Court.pow2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Memphis College of Art
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: There is not much here to evaluate. The article has one paragraph total, but it seems like it could be the lead section of a potential page. It gives a slight overview of what the article should be about.

Content: The content included here is relevant and up to date. It is extremely limited, however. It is missing major sections that the topic should include.

Tone and Balance: The tone is neutral and does not seem like it is at all trying to persuade readers.

Sources and References: This is a good point in the article, that it has many sources that are reliable. They are cited well, after the sentences that need it.

Organization: It is organized so far. There are no headings or subheadings.

Overall: The article is very incomplete but has some facts that are backed up.

~

Peer Review Response
Thank you for reviewing, but I think you may have peer reviewed the wrong article. My article is through this link: User:Court.pow2/New sandbox