User:Coveymambo/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The Fair Jilt

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose The Fair Jilt because it is the story I am most invested in right now. Because I enjoyed it, I want to be sure the page is accurate and well written. My first impression of the article was positive.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead: The lead is extremely concise at only one sentence long, but it contains all relevant material.

Content: Content is up to date and relevant. More about public perception of Behn would have been nice but that information just might not be out there.

Tone/balance: I see no issues in the neutrality of the article.

Sources: Only two of the provided five links work.

Organization/writing quality: I found no issues with either of these things.

Images/media: There is only one picture of the cover/opening page which is linked to one of the references that does work.

Talk page discussion: The talk page is pretty minimal, but what is there follows the guidelines we've learned and are clear and polite.

Overall impressions: On a surface level, the Wiki article is well written and covers important information. The biggest issue is the references with dead/nonfunctioning links.