User:Cpetryshyn/Andal/TaliaMary Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?:  Cpetryshyn
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Cpetryshyn/Andal

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? I don't think they included the lead in their sand box, but just what they are planning to add, which I think is fine!
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes very!
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes!
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think that the content could be expanded on because right now what they have written is pretty short

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, but there is only one source
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? I think they could consult more sources
 * Are the sources current? Its from 1999, but considering that this is about a woman from long ago I think that is fine.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Not for me.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes!
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I could see!
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, but again I think they could add more!

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images
 * Are images well-captioned? There are no images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There are no images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There are no images

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes absolutely
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I think it is very strong
 * How can the content added be improved? I think adding more content generally speaking would be helpful!

Overall evaluation
(This is also in your talk page) Hey! I have no idea if you can see who is reviewing your article but this is Talia, if you have any further questions about my comments please let me know in class. First of all, I really liked your article, I think it comments well on how she and her acts contributed to the history of feminist thought, and while it was very short I think it was well written. However, I think there is room for improvement. First of all, (and I know you are probably planning on doing this) I think your article could really benefit from you writing more and adding more info about her. I also think it would be beneficial to cite more than one article, as it will really strengthen your point!