User:Cprej18/Grant Gazelle/Axel sauce Peer Review

This article gives a nice overview of this species and what the Grant's Gazelle's typical living conditions and threats will be. This article covers a lot of good topics but fails to expand on some things and only briefly mentions them. For example, "Rainfall seems to be determinate of their diets" is stated but then no further explanation is provided. Adding more details about single topics can make a huge change to this article because with more and more details we can have a better understanding of the biology of this species and what causes them to behave as they do. This sort of knowledge can then be applied to similar situations in other species or in similar species. That being said though the information that is present already in this article is on topic and relevant information.

I think that where user "Cprej18" is adding their information to is an appropriate place and also a category that is not as flushed out as it could be. Many things on this article are mentioned and not flushed out and this is certainly one of the areas that need more details. It does not feel biased or contrived or like it is trying to convince me to one side or another of an argument. The references used are appropriate and not too heavily balanced to one side or another but it does feel like the information being added about the predators could use some more details. Since dehydration and heat stress are not exactly related to predators of this gazelle it feels like the information being added is a bit disconnected from each other.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)