User:Craig.rodrigues19/sandbox

It's lit in the sandbox

 Article Evaluation: 

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? (Craig)

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? (Josh)

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? (Julie)

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? (Alisha)

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are they secondary sources? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

No, no it is not. Facts aren't referenced at all for most of the article. Those that are referenced have outdated references that are well over 5 years old. The references don't appear until near the end of the article. Furthermore, some of the references are just online websites, news articles, and other secondary sources which are susceptible to bias, although unlikely in this topic. There were a few articles that were referenced from PubMed and journals, but overall, this page appears to have a lot of updating that needs to be done regarding references.

Is any information out of date (within 5 years from the publication date)? Is anything missing that could be added? (Jesse)

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? (Gleb) -

<<>>

Outline the article as it stands. What do you plan to contribute?