User:Craig lane5/User:Craig lane5/sandbox/GunnarLacher Peer Review

General info
Craig lane5
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Craig lane5/sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer Review Lead In - Article Lead Section -
 * 1) One thing that the article does well, is the organization. The article is clearly organized and shows what the text is about and what its trying to explain.
 * 2) One suggestion I have for the article, is to go further in depth with some on of the topics. For example, when you talk about how depression can be different depending on your gender. Instead of saying how "Zhang also gives different facts on athletes gender differences the things they have to go through because of their depression", Go into further detail and explain those facts.
 * 3) Going into further depth is the most important thing.
 * 4) One thing that I could apply to my own article is the organization and the headers that help break up the text into different sections.


 * 1) Yes, I feel satisfied knowing that athletes can be affected my depression, and knowing that it is a real problem.
 * 2) Yes, the lead reflects the most important information.
 * 3) The lead doesn't give more weight to certain points of the article than others.

Structure -


 * 1) Yes, the sections are well organized and in a sensible order.
 * 2) Each section has an equal length and an equal importance level. Each section feels important to the article and helps further explain the main point.
 * 3) From what i can tell all perspectives are being represented in the article.
 * 4) It definitely is trying to help the reader understand that Athletes can be affected by curtain things such as depression and things that affect their mental health.

Neutral Content -


 * 1) I could guess that the author agrees with that is being said in the article.
 * 2) Yes, the article doesn't have any word or phrases that feel neutral.
 * No, the articles doesn't make any claims on behalf of unnamed groups.
 * 1) Kind of, the topic is generally negative because depression is a sad and negative topic in general.

Reliable Resource -


 * 1) All of the statements are connected to reliable sources.
 * 2) None of the sources are the same. Two of the sources are on the same topic, but never from the same article or person.
 * No, the statement are correctly and all labeled.

Reviewers Reflection -

After reading this article i plan to do these three things to my own article.


 * 1) Organize my article better
 * 2) Make sure my article is neutral and doesn't favor a curtain side.