User:CrayfishClarinetist/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The Klezmatics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the article because they're my favourite band, and they're an important part of modern Yiddish culture and klezmer music. My preliminary impression was that the article has a few "citations needed" spots, and some of the members do not have their own wikipedia page, but that it did appear to include most relevant information about the band and their albums/performances.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

 * Good overview of band

Content

 * May not be up to date on band members and albums

Tone and Balance

 * Heavily focused on band members and featured musicians
 * No non-neutral viewpoints

Sources and References

 * Some sources need citations
 * Some links have no page attached

Organization and Writing Quality

 * Organized into four relevant categories
 * Writing is clear and concise

Images and Media

 * Has two images, one of the band from the early 2000's, and one from a 2013 performance
 * Images well-captioned

Talk Page Discussion

 * Only one comment, made in December 2007
 * Stub-class
 * Supported by WikiProject Musicians (low-importance)

Overall Impressions

 * Good article, could use some citation addition