User:Crazymonkey1123/Personal Grading Criteria for RfA Requests

This is my basic personal grading criteria for !voting in RfA's. Even if you meet this criteria, it does not guarantee that I will give you a support !vote in your RfA. I might not even !vote in your RfA. This is what I look for: If the user meets 7-9 of these criteria, the are likely to get a support !vote from me. If they meet 5-6 of these criteria, they will probably get a neutral !vote from me. If they meet only 4 or less of these criteria, they are almost guaranteed to get a oppose !vote. If you would like to contact me with any question regarding the way I grade RfA candidates, feel free to do so on my talk page.
 * 1) User has more than 3500 edits.
 * 2) User has not been blocked ever. If they have, it should be at least 6+ months ago. Blocks relating to vandalism should be 1+ years ago.
 * 3) User shows a history of patrolling others' work (patrolling new pages, reviewing revisions if they have the reviewer userright, ect.).
 * 4) User often combats vandalism (manually and automatically).
 * 5) User has a history of making manual edits.
 * 6) User does not have a tendency to bite other editors.
 * 7) User is active in at least one WikiProject.
 * 8) User often reports vandals/users with an inappropriate username/3RR violators/Sockpuppeteers and their sockpuppets to the correct notice board with the correct format.
 * 9) User request pages often vandalized that they have reverted on many times recently to the RfPP noticeboard.