User:Creigpat/Corporate Farming

Corporate farming is a term used to describe companies that own or influence farms and agricultural practices on a large scale. This includes not only corporate ownership of farms and selling of agricultural products, but also the roles of these companies in influencing agricultural education, research, and public policy through funding initiatives and lobbying efforts.

The definition and effects of corporate farming on agriculture are widely debated, though most sources that describe large businesses in agriculture as "corporate farms" usually portray their role in a negative light.

Legal definitions
Corporate farming also has a number of legal definitions, mostly pertaining to tax laws, anti-corporate farming laws , and census data collection. These definitions mostly reference farm income, indicating farms over a certain threshold as corporate farms, as well as ownership of the farm, specifically targeting farms that do not pass ownership through family lines.

Common definitions
In public discourse, the term "corporate farming" lacks a firmly established definition due to inconsistencies in how it is applied. However, there are several features that are consistent in the terms usage:


 * 1) It is largely used as a pejorative with strong negative connotations.
 * 2) It most commonly refers to corporations that are large-scale farms, market agricultural technologies (in particular pesticides, fertilizers, and GMO's), have significant economic and political influence, or some combination of the three.
 * 3) It is usually used in opposition to family farms and new agricultural movements, such as sustainable agriculture and the local food movement.

Contradiction of definitions
The varied and fluid meaning of "corporate farming" has resulted in different definitions of the term conflicting with one another, a fact that has implications in particular with legal definitions of corporate farms.

Family Farms
"Family farm" and "corporate farm" are often defined as mutually exclusive and opposing terms, with the entities that each represents having fundamentally opposing goals. This mostly stems from the widespread assumption that family farms are small farms while corporate farms are large scale operations. While it is true that the majority of small farms are family owned, many large farms are also family businesses, including some of the largest farms in the US.

Additionally, there are large economic and legal incentives for family farmers to incorporate their businesses. This has led to the fact that the majority of family farms in the US are also legally defined as corporations, further muddying the distinction between family and corporate farms.

Contract Farming
Farming contracts are agreements between a farmer and a buyer that stipulates what the farmer will grow and how much they will grow usually in return for guaranteed purchase of the product or financial support in purchase of inputs (e.g. feed for livestock growers). In most instances of contract farming, the farm is family owned while the buyer is a larger corporation. This makes it difficult to distinguish the contract farmers from "corporate farms," because they are family farms but with significant corporate influence. This subtle distinction left a loop-hole in many state laws that prohibited corporate farming, effectively allowing corporations to farm in these states as long as they contracted with local farm owners.

Non-farm Entities
Many people also choose to include non-farming entities in their definitions of corporate farming. Beyond just the farm contractors mentioned above, these types of companies commonly considered part of the term include Cargill, Monsanto, and DuPont Pioneer among others. These corporations don't have production farms, meaning they don't produce a significant amount of farm products. However, their role in producing and selling agricultural technologies as well as purchase and processing of farm products often leads to them being grouped with corporate farms. While this is technically incorrect, many find including these companies in the term "corporate farming" useful in order to describe the influence of large companies over agriculture, even when those companies don't themselves own and operate farms.

Anti-Corporate Farming Laws
To date, nine US states have enacted laws that restrict or prohibit corporate farming. The first of these laws were enacted in the 1930s by Kansas and North Dakota respectively. In the 1970s, similar laws were passed in Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, South Dakota and Wisconsin. In 1982, after failure to pass an anti-corporate farming law, the citizens of Nebraska petitioned the state government and voted a similar amendment into their state constitution. The citizens of South Dakota similarly amended their state constitution in 1998.

All nine laws are very similar to each other in terms of content. They all restrict corporate ability to own and operate on farmland, as well as outline exceptions for specific types of corporations that are exempt. The laws do, however, vary significantly in how they define a corporate farm and the way in which they restrict corporate farming. Definitions of a farm can include any and all farm operations, or be dependent on where income is coming from, as in Iowa, where 60 percent of income must come from farm products. Additionally, these laws can target a corporations use of the land, meaning that companies can own but not farm the land, or they may outright prohibit corporations from buying and owning farmland. The precise wording of these laws have significant impact on how corporations can participate in agriculture in these states with the ultimate goal of protecting and empowering the family farm.