User:Cretog8/Todo

Merges to work on

 * Talk:Buyer_decision_processes
 * English auction, Candle auction
 * Raffle, Chinese auction
 * Bertrand competition, Bertrand paradox (economics) Differentiated Bertrand competition
 * Talk:Normative_economics Positive economics, Normative economics
 * Commons dilemma, Tragedy of the Commons, Social trap? See Talk:Tragedy_of_the_commons.
 * Should Diseconomy of scale be re-merged with returns to scale? Is it OR?
 * What about NAIRU and Natural rate of unemployment?
 * Merge Inverse demand function w/ Demand curve, Demand schedule and or Demand (economics)?
 * Demand article should have bits on individual demand, market demand aggregate demand (macro)
 * Connect (if not merge) w/ Marshallian demand function, Hicksian demand function, Law of demand
 * Dunning-Kruger effect, Lake Wobegon effect, Overconfidence effect should be merged or handled somehow, and combined listing in List of cognitive biases.
 * Model_(macroeconomics) merge with Model (economics)
 * Subjective theory of value, Value (economics), Value theory, Theory of value (economics), Intrinsic theory of value, Exchange value, partial merge discussion at Talk:Intrinsic theory of value/Archives/2012 and Talk:Theory_of_value_(economics)
 * Free price system should be merged with a mainstream price article, and Austrian-specific stuff moved to Austrian articles.
 * also related Price signal, Price mechanism, price system, Price
 * Revisit merge of Common-pool resource and Common good (economics)
 * Merge the basics: Supply and demand, Partial equilibrium, economic equilibrium, competitive equilibrium various price mechanism things?
 * and what about Market clearing?
 * Merge Effective demand aggregate demand
 * Choice cleanup link "main article" to which? decision theory, other?
 * Temporal discounting, Intertemporal choice, Discounted utility, Discount function?, Time preference
 * Pricing, Pricing science, Pricing strategies, (maybe also Yield management?), Profit maximization
 * Willingness to pay, Willingness to accept C RETOG 8(t/c) 00:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Intertemporal consumption, Intertemporal choice C RETOG 8(t/c) 09:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

possible deletions

 * Artificial demand
 * Keynesian endpoint
 * Merger simulation

Fringe
Read Fringe_theories/Arbitration_cases C RETOG 8(t/c) 05:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Economics article
Here's some other articles to look at for comparison: optics, psychology, anthropology, biology, meteorology, chemistry, sociology, geography, physics History of the world History

Current issues:
 * Do comparison of current production section with (see talk)

Economic problem article is weird. I think it should be deleted and included as material in Economics. C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Think Tanks
See Exit2DOS2000's list of some think-tanks.

Try to look for questionable things by "links here".

Post-"Advocacy think tanks"
I'm figuring to open a discussion, which I expect will get heated, on how to cite various think tanks. Hopefully it doesn't need to get too heated. As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't need to get resolved quickly. Editing economics articles, I frequently come across references to the Mises Institute and the Cato Institute. Less often other think tanks such as the Economic Policy Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and American Enterprise Institute. I'm agnostic about whether places like the Brookings Institution and the Hoover Institute are advocacy think tank or just a think tanks. I think it's clear that a place like RAND can be treated as a purely academic source, without advocacy concerns. There's certainly other organizations which will come up, but that's a start.

I honestly haven't been able to decide the standards to apply to references to these organizations (and I need to figure out how to compose sentences with fewer than 4 nested "to" clauses). They are advocacy organizations. They can do good research, but they don't always do so. The research they choose to do/support and publicize are selected based on viewpoints, so even the good research has a kind of POV publication bias.

I personally have little hesitation in citing these organizations in regards to clear-cut facts. There are probably exceptions where they mess up, and when they do mess up it's probably in-line with their biases. But I expect they're careful enough about their reputations that they try hard to get the facts right. Interpretations of the facts, from these organizations, I expect to be POV.

Likewise, I think that many of these organizations can be considered good representatives of some point of view. I wouldn't worry much about citing the Cato Institute if I wanted to say, "Economic libertarians say X.".

Anyway, is this a hard call, or am I being too careful? Should I take this whole topic somewhere else? Has this alwready been solved somewhere else? There's some discussion here and here.

Here's some examples:
 * 1) In Minimum_wage, both Cato and EPI are cited in the "Support" or "Oppose" lists. I think that makes sense because it's framed as advocacy. However, later, both are also cited commenting on Card and Krueger's minimum wage studies. I'm not comfortable with that because it doesn't make it clear that these are criticisms coming from advocacy organizations rather than from independent economists in academic publications.

Nobel
Inconsistency in names of templates such as Template:Sveriges Riksbank laureates in economics 2001–2025

Make template for prize name to use in articles?

Revisit article name when? C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

to look at

 * The simExchange
 * DKP
 * Nobelpricewinner Prof. William Vickrey: 15 fatal fallacies of financial fundamentalism-A Disquisition on Demand Side Economics--removed as link from inappropriate article, but still interesting essay. Reread when time.
 * Rule of three (economics) C RETOG 8(t/c) 18:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Graphics
User:SilverStar has a cool gallery of graphics, including economics. C RETOG 8(t/c) 06:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Yupi666 also has some nice graphics C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Sheitan has some, not sure which, but including Image:Perfect competition in the short run.PNG

stats
Law of large numbers, Borel's law of large numbers, and Statistical regularity all look ready to merge. Cretog8 (talk) 01:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Principle of maximum entropy is way technical right off the bat. C RETOG 8(t/c) 22:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Sign test needs work. C RETOG 8(t/c) 17:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Effect size C RETOG 8(t/c) 18:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Discovery science C RETOG 8(t/c) 18:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

game theory
Are there articles/organization for learning in game theory/economics? Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Is Chainstore paradox still orphaned? (Is there a way to check? [|lniks]) Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, still orphaned, 1 proper link. Cretog8 (talk) 05:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Rock-paper-scissors has almost no discussion of game theory? Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[This is cool]. I wonder what can be done with JavaScript? Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Voting_system not really right that Arrow started mathematical approach, since that goes back at least to 19th century. How to rephrase? Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The Market for Lemons needs work. Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Envy-free, Proportional (fair division), Chore division, Divide and choose, Fair division, Adjusted Winner procedure, Pie rule, Moving-knife procedure (others?) -- that's a lot of short articles swirling around the same cake vortex. Not quite sure which should merge with what, but it really seems like there should be a merge or few. This has already been commented on at least a little at Talk:Fair_division. Cretog8 (talk) 22:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Zero-sum also wants some help. There's a reference to vN & M in there which is interesting. Cretog8 (talk) 01:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Auctions need review/cleanup, including linking pages from Game theory, Auction, Auction theory(?). These include: Sealed first-price auction, Candle auction, Chinese auction, Forward auction, Mystery auction, French auction, Walrasian auction, Spectrum auction. Cretog8 (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC) (a lot of this has been done, check it out from scratch)Cretog8 (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

In game theory article, discrete and continuous looks like it needs work. It's unreferenced, and says various odd things: Cretog8 (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * "Most of the objects treated in most branches of game theory are discrete" -- There's certainly plenty of continuous game theory
 * "engineering and physics" -- Really?!?
 * "For example, the set of possible moves for each of n players would be a subset of the real number line, with each player assigned a respective pay-off function taking as input an n-tuple of each player's chosen value." -- I guess that's correct, but very awkward.
 * "usually time" -- probably not
 * aren't differential games a specific thing?

Differential game is quite stubby stub. Cretog8 (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Choquet integral -- should do one-stage vs. two-stage. Cretog8 (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Article on forward induction? C RETOG 8(t/c) 09:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Maybe an article on Gambit? C RETOG 8(t/c) 12:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Ellsberg paradox should have inline refs C RETOG 8(t/c) 04:52, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Mostly done, but that edition of Keynes is tricky. C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Ellsberg paradox, Knightian uncertainty, uncertainty, ambiguity aversion need to be connected. C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Dollar auction needs work, particularly refs, since a lot of stuff looks a bit OR-ish. Also check out this diff. Point was right to get removed, but maybe a comment on incentive compatibility would fit. C RETOG 8(t/c) 11:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Should Coherent risk measure be game theory project also? C RETOG 8(t/c) 03:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Simultaneous action selection -- I thought I had discussed this?! Did the talk page get deleted? C RETOG 8(t/c) 18:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Metagaming--is this really related to game theory and mechanism design? !!!!

game theory--add Bernoulli, Bertrand, and Borel to history. C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Info-gap decision theory is linked in Ellsberg paradox. It's a huge article for what seems to be an obscure topic, but maybe I'm just unaware? Or maybe it's partly OR? C RETOG 8(t/c) 13:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

New article on Nash program? C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Large poisson game C RETOG 8(t/c) 15:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Article for Forward induction? C RETOG 8(t/c) 02:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

merge Mathematical game into game theory? C RETOG 8(t/c) 18:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Quantum game theory
Some discussion on Quantum game theory with IP editor 68.98.137.71. Also on Prisoner's dilemma.

Copied from the IP editor's talk page:

Hello
Please don't take my modification of your edits the wrong way--it looks to me like you're new to wikipedia editing (if I'm wrong, please let me know). It appears you could help improve coverage of quantum game theory a good bit, and that would be great. I lean towards being a stickler for good referencing and balancing articles in accord with mainstream use, because that seems to help avoid later problems, so my modifications are in that spirit.

I haven't been impressed with quantum game theory, but that's gone in parallel with not really understanding it. It might well be worth improving my understanding, though my free brain-time is short. Regardless of my opinion of it, within the game theory community, quantum game theory gets very little play. That's why most stuff you'll see about it appears in physics journals and the like instead of game theory journals. To me that makes it still pretty "low" importance for the game theory project. You should probably join the project as an editor, and discuss it at the project's talk page. Others might disagree with me.

I find it easiest to interact with other editors who make accounts and recognizable usernames, rather than editing under an IP identification. That's just a matter of taste for me--you can do most things here without creating an account. C RETOG 8(t/c) 00:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Quantum game theory
I can't mentally process your note at Talk:Quantum game theory right now. I'll respond when I can. Feel free to edit before I respond, or wait until after. I won't undo any edits you make there at least until I feel I can respond to your comments. You're right that I'm not up-to-date on Quantum game theory, although I am pretty well-versed in general game theory, and microeconomics. Hopefully others will see that the article is getting some attention and jump in to participate. C RETOG 8(t/c) 00:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Quantum game theory discussion
By wikipedia policy (NOTFORUM), article discussion pages aren't supposed to be for discussion other than directly related to improving the article. I've got a lot of fuzziness on quantum game theory, maybe you can help clear it up. My math (and physics?) skills aren't up to readily following quantum game theory without more investment than I'd like, so I could well be missing things. However, whenever I do skim material on quantum game theory, I come away unimpressed. I think it's probably worthwhile work, but if it ever really pays off, I don't think it will be in fields like economics where game theory is traditionally applied.

My impression is that for standard uses of game theory QGT is unnecessary overkill. For instance, if you talk about the strategies in the prisoner's dilemma being entangled, then you've just redefined the game. It's possible without the heavy math of QGT to redefine the prisoner's dilemma so that there's "contracts", and if one does than standard Nash equilibrium can give cooperative outcomes. So, it looks like QGT is less about a different way of analyzing games, than a particular way of redefining games. If that's correct, then the issue becomes why the particular way of redefining games given in QGT is any better than the many ad hoc ways that modelers redefine games to approach different assumptions.

It may be I'm missing things. And if you're not up to this discussion, that's fine, too. C RETOG 8(t/c) 08:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

economics
It looks like the debate at places like Free trade debate, Dependency theory, Comparative advantage could use some work. Cretog8 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Is there some Index of Economic Freedom that doesn't come from an ideological source like the Heritage Foundation or (maybe?) the Fraser Institute? Do those two indices agree? See Economic Freedom of the World, Indices of Economic Freedom.Cretog8 (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * interesting commentary on an economic freedom analysis

Decommodification is new to me (in this context). The article could use a lot of filling out, plus the other meaning of decommodification. Also just like to read more about it.Cretog8 (talk) 18:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Prediction market as virtual market seems weird, also merge with information market? C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Kinked demand has notes implying it's incomprehensible. Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Physical capital? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

merge Elasticity of a function? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Sticky (economics) does it distinguish one-directional stickiness? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

What's the overlap of WikiProject Business and Economics and Economics WikiProject? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Capital accumulation similar to Wealth condensation? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Possibly write an article on Who really cares (book). Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Currently Franklin Fisher redirects to J Street. Fisher is part of J Street, but that's not a helpful redirect at all. Should make a stub article at least for him. Links:, Cretog8 (talk) 12:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow, Allocative efficiency is a mess. Cretog8 (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC) ...likewise Distributive efficiencyCretog8 (talk) 05:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

This diff seems to be too strong in dismissing predatory pricing argument re IE/Netscape. Find refs and reinstate? Cretog8 (talk) 04:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Mesoeconomics--What the hell? Cretog8 (talk) 17:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

George Akerlof is an itty-bitty stub with odd focus. C RETOG 8(t/c) 21:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Gérard Debreu is a mess C RETOG 8(t/c) 21:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Ronald Coase could use a bit of cleanup, and a little more on the Coase conjecture. C RETOG 8(t/c) 23:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

This is depressing. Should James Mirrlees be game theory? George Akerlof, Michael Spence, Joseph E. Stiglitz, Daniel Kahneman, Vernon L. Smith? C RETOG 8(t/c) 23:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

this diff is a big diff; maybe sorta right, but those ideas should come up in the article somehow. Cretog8 (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Supply and demand doesn't apply to markets with perfect competition~ Eek! Cretog8 (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

No article on Mark Machina. C RETOG 8(t/c) 04:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

For network effects, links to Bell annual reports. C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

correspondence principle not clearly described in any one place for economics -- Foundations of economic analysis is likely the closest. C RETOG 8(t/c) 10:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Geolibertarianism, Georgism, and Land value tax (others?) has graph with perfectly inelastic supply of land. That needs to be qualified. C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Harrod-Domar model formatted weird. C RETOG 8(t/c) 08:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Tragedy of the commons has a big quote from Mises when it should have a bit more explanation of Coase. C RETOG 8(t/c) 04:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Factor world and Productivity world seem to be deletion material? C RETOG 8(t/c) 22:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

?? Cost-of-production theory of value ?? C RETOG 8(t/c) 22:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Virtual Bidding just started. C RETOG 8(t/c) 02:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

While assessing, Tradable, Want, and Reflation caught notice as unreferenced and possibly OR. C RETOG 8(t/c) 06:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Also Military Keynesianism C RETOG 8(t/c) 06:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * And Baker Cube C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Egonomics has inklings of a reference. C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * And Atomistic market C RETOG 8(t/c) 18:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * maybe Flexicurity‎? C RETOG 8(t/c) 08:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Should Exogeny be Exogeneity? C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Should Debunking Economics by Steve Keen get an article? C RETOG 8(t/c) 05:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

User_talk:Johnrpenner -- if he doesn't do it, possibly I should. C RETOG 8(t/c) 05:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Merge Nature's services and ecosystem services? C RETOG 8(t/c) 14:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Morale hazard neologism? Is it significant enough to be in Moral hazard lead? C RETOG 8(t/c) 17:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Crowding out (economics) at least the health insurance stuff seems to be POV and mixed-quality sourcing.

Make sure that Lists_of_countries are in the project. C RETOG 8(t/c) 23:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Where does Decision analysis fit with Decision theory? C RETOG 8(t/c) 09:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Choice Modelling needs cleanup, and should redirect to Choice modelling, instead of the other way around. C RETOG 8(t/c) 09:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Choice Modelling, Decision analysis, Decision theory, Utility, Discrete Choice Modelling, Utility maximization problem, Optimal decision -- definitely want at least some merging. C RETOG 8(t/c) 09:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC) -- also Discrete choice C RETOG 8(t/c) 10:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Say's law too long, partially due to phrasing, also there's redundancy, and competing POV's--overall too much POV. Needs a lot of cleanup. C RETOG 8(t/c) 06:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Economy of the United States numbers seems scattered, possibly off.

Cost the limit of price looks largely like WP:OR. C RETOG 8(t/c) 16:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Is Dollar voting salvageable? C RETOG 8(t/c) 14:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Intangible good should this be an article at all? Definitely needs better refs. C RETOG 8(t/c) 15:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Demerit good? C RETOG 8(t/c) 15:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Single new article on preference reversal? C RETOG 8(t/c) 00:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Division of labour, these changes are appropriate because it wasn't cited, but mostly the material there looks OK, should be able to ref much of it and put it back. C RETOG 8(t/c) 02:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Predatory_pricing has EL to Antitrust World Wiki, which actually looks good, but probably isn't a wp:rs. Can that stuff be trans-wikied here and verified? C RETOG 8(t/c) 12:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Seems like this article by VL Smith on Hayek and Experimental Economics would be a sensible ref for Austrian/experimental issues. C RETOG 8(t/c) 15:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Predatory pricing need cleanup of refs and external links - libertarian think tanks overplayed. C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Ugh, David McNally (professor) regarding these additions, article sorta review Marxist? C RETOG 8(t/c) 00:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Price support is pretty much just a stub C RETOG 8(t/c) 00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Is Quantum economics just self-promotion? C RETOG 8(t/c) 03:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Market power stuff
Looks like lots of market power stuff separated out into too many articles? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Market system seems to want to be too much, while actually being very little. Needs to either figure out what it is or get deleted? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Market structure is a nice summaryish, but should it be its own article? Category? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Market dominance, Dominance (economics), Market dominance, Monopoly profit Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC) See also Monopoly law Cretog8 (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Oligopoly, Duopoly Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC) Duopoly should have the broadcasting stuff moved to concentration of media ownership. Cretog8 (talk) 18:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Market failure probably appropriate to have its own article. Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Natural monopoly Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Monopsony probably should be separate? Or merged with Oligopsony? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Coercive monopoly looks like its mostly law & politics, so appropriately its own article? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Perfect_competition and Imperfect competition have separate articles. Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Income inequality metrics, Robin Hood index, Market concentration, Herfindahl index, Concentration ratio, Gini coefficient, Lorenz curve, Theil index, Atkinson index, Suits index merge? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Kuznets curve something different Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

(Theil index looks really good at first blush.) Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Abnormal profit should be merged with... something? Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Duopoly has too much specificity. Could move all the media stuff to Concentration of media ownership Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Check on Excess burden of taxation, Deadweight loss merger proposal. That doesn't really seem appropriate, unless excess burden... just becomes one section of the other, which probably isn't great either. Cretog8 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Book article for The Economics of Imperfect Competition? C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Monopsony needs inline refs. C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

High definition optical disc format war C RETOG 8(t/c) 13:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Teaching games
History of the board game Monopoly C RETOG 8(t/c) 22:39, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

This'n'That
Collaborative filtering seems to have a lot of related stuff, which maybe should be merged? (search on term "collaborative filtering") Cretog8 (talk) 01:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Innovation_economics looks weird, probably needs polish, references, mainstreaming. C RETOG 8(t/c) 16:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Freedom (philosophy), Liberty, Freedom (political) merge? Cretog8 (talk) 22:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Kahneman needs inline refs. C RETOG 8(t/c) 21:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

See User_talk:Jinxs C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Joan Robinson needs an infobox. Picture? C RETOG 8(t/c) 23:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Michael Porter ditto. C RETOG 8(t/c) 23:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Update Nancy Segal with C RETOG 8(t/c) 08:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Add Tucson Economic Indicators to Tucson. C RETOG 8(t/c) 17:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Blepharitis C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Spalding Method advertisement C RETOG 8(t/c) 07:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Criticisms of socialism refs all screwy in code. C RETOG 8(t/c) 12:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

See Categorization_of_people re Category:Five Percenters

Should Overjustification effect be its own article? C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Self-organization seems full of uncited links to theses. C RETOG 8(t/c) 22:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Artificial scarcity pretty much unreferenced essay. C RETOG 8(t/c) 06:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

restore "prestige good"? C RETOG 8(t/c) 14:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Categories
Realizing I'm not sure how categories work. Should an article be given all relevant categories, or the lowest relevant category, and the other categories are covered implicitly by moving up the tree?


 * Category: Economics
 * Category:Industrial organization
 * Category:Econometrics
 * Category:Microeconomics
 * Category:Monopoly (economics)
 * Category:Imperfect competition
 * Category:Market structure and pricing
 * Category:Economics of regulation
 * Category:Anti-competitive behaviour
 * Category:Economic efficiency
 * Category:Monetary economics
 * Category:Capital
 * Category:Economics terminology
 * Category:Unassessed-Class, Unknown-importance Economics articles

Keep an eye on Category:Social Information Processing

experimental economics
Experimental economics kinda messy. Big quote from Vernon Smith at the beginning is probably too much. Cretog8 (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Edward Chamberlin should mention early experimental, (influence on Smith?). C RETOG 8(t/c) 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Simulations and games in economics education should connect with experimental economics. C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

human subjects
Milgram experiment seems to say nothing about its use as an example for human subjects training. Cretog8 (talk) 18:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:Human experimentation in the United States seems to only be about "bad" stuff. There's lots of human experimentation, and should be linked to human subjects rules & history. (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Similarly for Category:Human experimentation by country Cretog8 (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:Human_experimentation is just a little better Cretog8 (talk) 18:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Human subject research is mixed, a bit messy and confusing Cretog8 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Human subject research seems to only describe experimentation rather than research in general. C RETOG 8(t/c) 05:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Wiki mechanics
Maybe use DOI? Template:User_committed_identity? Search_engine_test Template:Google_templates

McCloskey critique
McCloskey critique is still iffy, but should possibly be included in "critiques" in Statistical hypothesis testing. Cretog8 (talk) 01:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Are there good refs? Some web searching turns up:
 * McCloskey's rhetoric
 * A rhetoric in defense of formalism in the social sciences
 * Rhetoric of Science...
 * The Role of Values in Post-Modern Economics

Auction
User:Debate has rightly moved a lot of stuff from Auction. Possibly some of it should go back in a different form. Particularly various "terminology" or "auction type" could be included as *characteristics* of various auctions.


 * Time rules-Duration, hard close, soft close, random close, other?
 * Open outcry or not -- anonymous or not
 * discriminative vs. competitive
 * other?

Tools

 * AutoWikiBrowser/Plugins
 * Category:Conversion templates & wp:units
 * WikiScanner
 * User:Nickj/Can_We_Link_It
 * AutoWikiBrowser

Not a tool, but consider: Don't-give-a-fuckism.

Google search WikiProject Econimics

Nuisance links
ANI

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Random
Check out Special:Contributions/Ratpow and Special:Contributions/Phronetic C RETOG 8(t/c) 19:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Also Special:Contributions/Hellofdecrepid and Special:Contributions/Eartheconomics C RETOG 8(t/c) 20:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)