User:CrimsonJF/Phloeodes diabolicus/Jdgoffard Peer Review

General info
CrimsonJF
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:CrimsonJF/Phloeodes diabolicus :Review of the sandbox draft of her article
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Phloeodes diabolicus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is properly updated to encompass the information you added. I like that in the introduction there is the fun fact that the beetles can support such a huge amount of weight, because the beetle is known for that. And then you expand on that in later sections. The in-depth explanation in the "Shell Structure" section is great. I can tell you really took your time to understand the bio-physical mechanism behind how the beetle can support so much weight. It's very clearly described. The "Taxonomic History" section was also very necessary since this beetle had some taxonomic changes. The changes in taxonomy made are clearly described -- good job.

This article has good breadth and depth in and across the sections. I've checked some of your links, and they work. You added a good amount of links, so viewers can easily refer to other wikipedia pages. You added a good amount of sources -- about 5 yourself.

Your article content looks good! Just make sure every paragraph has a heading. I'm assuming you have already added this when you transferred the work to the live page, though. The image plus the "scientific classification" is in a good spot on the live article. When I click on the images I can see the title and credit. My only suggestion is that the image of the pinned beetles might be better fit closer to the section that describes how entomologists have trouble pinning the beetles. But it's not super necessary to do this.