User:Crimson Kai/Imprinting (psychology)/MPHILLI Peer Review

General info
Crimson Kai
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crimson%20Kai/Imprinting_%28psychology%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Imprinting (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

While reading the article, I noticed some sections that could use some improving but I also noticed that a section can be added the article. A section that I think that would really improve the article is adding a history section of imprinting. I noticed that the article just goes straight into the different effects of imprinting and might confuse readers if they are looking fr history too. Adding a history section will make the article more appealing as well as give a general background on appealing and would be a gradual and smooth transition into the different kinds of imprinting.

You can also add more information to the baby duck syndrome a well as add another section that might talk about the symptoms that show up with imprinting. Having a symptoms section will also improve the quality of the article and make readers more inclined to read the article.