User:Crobin06/sandbox

Evaluating Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism

The first sentence (and paragraph) do provide useful introductory information to the topic, but there seems to be no proper "beginning" to the article.

While there are plentiful citations, the quotations seem to be kept to a minimum in most sections of the article; however, it is quite clear to a casual observer that multiple authors are working on this, and once the information included has been finalized, a proper "tying together" is certainly in order.

Grammar and spelling errors are minimal.

Language used is almost entirely neutral and unpersuasive.

Article does not at any point seem to pull heavily from any single source, but uses a broad range of sources (which, at a glance, seem to be quite good sources).

Article does lean pretty heavily on headings, but due to the structure of the article it seems fairly appropriate in lieu of bulleted lists or some other off-limits medium of categorization.

I would first start with cleaning up and perhaps adding to the introductory paragraph to better welcome the reader to the page and the topic, then attempt to tackle the transitions between different sections of the article to give a better "flow" to the reading experience.