User:Crocodileman/Talk

For newer content, see User talk:Crocodileman

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!--Edchilvers 20:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Dinosaur articles
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --NMChico24 20:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Crocodileman,
 * Thanks for your many edits to prehistoric reptile articles. However, I have been unable to verify some of the information you have written. For example, you have created an article called Xiaosauridae, a "nomen nudum group of dinosaurs" (sic). I'm not sure how a group of nomina nuda could constitute a valid taxon, and "Xiaosauridae" returns no non-wiki google hits. There's a reference to Don Lessem, but I don't get any hits on Lessem having worked with Xiaosaurus, either.
 * Where does this info come from? Do you have a link to the paper? Wikipedia forbids original research, so any article must cite reliable references.
 * In addition, the folks at WikiProject Dinosaurs are mainly using Benton's taxonomy for family- and higher-level taxa, and it would be a good idea if everyone used the same respected sources. Firsfron of Ronchester  19:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Dinosaur image
Hi Crocodileman, Thank you for adding the Image:Xuanhuaceratops.JPG to the Chaoyangsauridae article. I encourage you to submit your drawings to the Dinosaur image review page where they can be peer-reviewed and checked for accuracy before loading them into the articles. Images that are anatomically inaccurate will be sooner or later removed. Additionally, there is a sign up list where you could find a list of the most wanted illustrations. Happy editing. ArthurWeasley 21:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Theoryofadeadman-the_last_song.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Theoryofadeadman-the_last_song.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Xiaosauridae
Leaving aside that there is currently no such thing as Xiaosauridae, and that recent papers on that area of the dinosaur tree (particularly Barrett et al. 2006 on Hexinlusaurus and Agilisaurus) found no need to create one, there's no need to unredirect Xiaosauridae and then replace the text with "See Xiaosaurus", since that means the page has the same function as it did as a redirect, only in a less convenient manner because the reader now has to manually redirect instead of being automatically redirected. J. Spencer 15:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Devin osmond, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chris 73 | Talk 17:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  -- Chris 73 | Talk 17:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Bands and stuff
Hi. If the band and its people will be famous one day, then they will have an article once they are famous. As for now, they are not notable enough according to WP:MUSIC to justify an article. Sorry, but the article about the band and its members will be deleted. Also, as per WP:CoI, you writing about yourself Devin osmond is a conflict of interest, and should be avoided. On a side note: Nice drawings of dinosaurs on your homepage. Hope this helps -- Chris 73 | Talk 17:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

re; Quiver (song) & others
Hi. I have placed a speedy delete tag on the above article. Whilst articles on the band and albums are (and may) be worthy of inclusion I do not believe that individual songs can be justified unless they are well known. If you disagree and can give good reason why the article should be kept then you should get over to the talkpage... Cheers. LessHeard vanU 22:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Quiver has been deleted. I have now requested speedy delete on No Surprise, Say Goodbye (Theory of a Deadman song) & Hello Lonely (Walk Away From This). Please don't think I am being vindictive or am anti Theory of a Deadman, I believe that the singles info could be included in the Gasoline (album) article no problem. What is a problem is the 'meaning' of each song; fans will know what the song is about, non fans will not care. Either way, it isn't encyclopedic. Most songs by most bands (even the really famous ones) do not have their own articles; if a song becomes famous enough then it will get an article... eventually. Just because a band is notable, and an album, is not sufficient reason for every track to have an article.
 * I hope that the above has not put you off. Enthusiasm is great. Keep writing articles and learning, and if in doubt be bold; it is better to write something and have it deleted/removed, than not to bother. Enjoy your editing! LessHeard vanU 22:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Say goodbye-.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Say goodbye-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hello lonely (waft).jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hello lonely (waft).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:No surprise cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:No surprise cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Herosingle.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Herosingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Santa Monica
Did you deliberately revert my change that removed the second link from several lines on this disambig page?

MoS:DP says that each entry should have exactly one blue link, and gives examples like the ones that were in this article as how not to do it.

My hope is that this reversion was an accident, that you somehow worked from an older version when you made the other changes in your edit.

See also my comments at Talk:Santa Monica about whether Santa Monica should really be a disambig page.

Jordan Brown 09:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Incorrect image tags
Hi Crocodileman,

Unfortunately, I've had to delete a few of the images you uploaded to Wikipedia. and were uploaded with tags indicating they were units of currency. Since neither image came from a unit of currency, the fair use rationale provided was invalid, and these images were deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, ''Invalid fair-use claim. Any image or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag (such as a "logo" tag on a photograph of a mascot) may be deleted at any time.''

I also had to delete, which was a copyvio of dinosauromorpha.com (no assertion of permission to use on Wikipedia), which was a blatant copyright infringement (G12).

Please read the notices on the upload page. Do not upload content with false license declarations. You can be blocked from editing. Please review each one of your image submissions and make sure each one complies with Wikipedia's Fair Use Policy. I do not want to go through and delete every one of the images you have uploaded, but I may be forced to if you do not use the correct licencing tags. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Animals (Nickelback)
Please don't add a link to your poll to the page. It isn't exactly content for an encyclopedia. Thanks. ~  E meZ  x  X  ` 04:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have removed every instance of this poll I could find. Please do not spam Wikipedia with your personal polls and pet projects.  It is considered vandalism.  Thanks, Resolute 03:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:No surprise.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:No surprise.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Billy Talent "Surrender" single
Where did you find this image? I can surely tell that it was scanned from the album booklet, then Photoshopped from there. Jordan Elder talk 19:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by Xxlbatmanlxx
Hi there. I've reverted vandalism to your userpage that was done by User:Xxlbatmanlxx. I've also reported him as a vandalism-only account. :)

Chrisch 16:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Plesiosaur template
Hi Crocodileman, Your plesiosaur template is not very useful. It is highly incomplete (if you really want to go down to the genus level) and contains what looks like some original research of your own. In which scientific publication did you read about a family by the name of 'Attenborosauridae?? And what's up with a link to the BBC Sea Monsters series? Anyway, we certainly do not use this kind of template for any living or extinct group of animals (or plants), so I've removed it from all the plesiosaur pages for now. ArthurWeasley 02:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Devin Osmond
Please do not re-create a redirect from Devin Osmond to your user page. Redirects to user pages are not permissible. People are either notable enough for an article or they are not. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 13:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tyler_connolly.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tyler_connolly.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:This Stupid Last Song (2007).JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:This Stupid Last Song (2007).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Video_sincebeengone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Video_sincebeengone.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 07:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:This Stupid Last Song (2007).JPG
Hello Crocodileman, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:This Stupid Last Song (2007).JPG) was found at the following location: User:Crocodileman. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Possible future single
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Possible future single
Template:Possible future single has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 21:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Title.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Title.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Never_too_late.gif
I have tagged Image:Never_too_late.gif as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MECU ≈ talk 18:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

User Subpages
Subpages should be created with names such as User:Crocodileman/page name. I have moved User:Crocodileman&action=Poll to User:Crocodileman/Poll and deleted the resultant redirect. I also fixed the link on your userpage. User:Crocodileman&action=Poll would be the user page of a (non-existent) user names Crocodileman&action=Poll. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 00:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Marine Reptiles userbox
Template:Marine Reptiles userbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — &mdash; Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 21:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Marine Reptiles userbox
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:WikiProject Marine Reptiles userbox, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:WikiProject Marine Reptiles userbox fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Ophaned template, nonexistent WikiProject To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:WikiProject Marine Reptiles userbox, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:WikiProject Marine Reptiles userbox itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Canadian Top 33
What are the criteria for songs being listed on your Top 33? Does this come from another source? Or is this just your list of favorite music? Sancho 02:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

You stole my user page :-)

 * Haha.. no, it's all good (I took the design from somebody else anyway), but you left a piece of code in the wikitext that I think might mess up the archive indexing and you might end up with an index of all the conversations in the archive of my user page:

""
 * You should take a look at User:HBC_Archive_Indexerbot. It has some okay instructions. Basically the mask section of that template directs the indexer where to look for archive pages. See you around. Sancho 23:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Chart positions
On your user page, you state that the "Canadian Top 33" is a chart that you have created. Please do not add these positions to articles as it is neither a notable nor official chart. --musicpvm 22:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Hinder discography
Please do not blank articles while they are being considered for deletion in an AfD, as you did on Hinder discography. This could be considreed vandalism. DES (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:See you at the show.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:See you at the show.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Nothing_to_lose.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nothing_to_lose.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 22:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


 * DUDE!!! This image was also tagged for not having information on its copyright status. I've taken care of that, and the fair use rationale that needs to go with it. Just take 2 seconds and list the URL of where you got the image from on the image description page, and it will be saved from deletion. Cheers. -- Reaper  X  05:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I linked it to the URL you gave at Media copyright questions. The image is in the clear. -- Reaper  X  05:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The diary of jane.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The diary of jane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jagged logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jagged logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)