User:Crowe614/Evaluate an Article

The topic (Cyborg anthropology) does include an intro sentence and a brief description on the topic. the article doesn't dig too deep into the topic but just enough. It did say it was relatively new but it's nearing a decade and doesn't really feel necessary with anything else. the article is very boring in forming any opinion so I think it's pretty neutral the was one section that said it use a main source but it feel relevant to the page and uses other articles as well. in the talk page, there doesn't seem to be a thread of individuals trying to make improvements to the page but haven't. not many pictures but good sources and names to look up on. overall, I think that his article works fairly well. ( don't feel that it has a bias of any sort other than to give information. it explain things well, and well I might want a little more explanation as to why it relevant to add, It does a good job explaining it without filling in any blanks.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)