User:Cry598a/Jan Spivey Gilchrist/Aschmidt32 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Cry598a
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Cry598a/Jan Spivey Gilchrist

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, it appears to have been updated.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the Lead has a strong introductory sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No it does not.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, it discusses the importance of her work and some of the awards she has won.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise, but it could use some more details about Jan Spivey Gilchrist and not so much about her awards.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content added helps to support and provide information on the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There does not appear to be any content missing.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are no claims that appear biased. The article presents a good overview of Jan Spivey Gilchrist's life and work.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it does not.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? All content appears to be backed up by reliable sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? They appear to reflect the available literature on this topic.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, they are current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, the links work correctly.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content is well written and the article flows well. The content added helps provide a good overview of the topic.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content is well organized and presents a good breakdown of the life/career of Jan Spivey Gilchrist

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the content appears to have greatly improved the quality of the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The added content gives a broader view of the life and work of Jan Spivey Gilchrist
 * How can the content added be improved? I do not see any obvious signs that the content needs improvement.

Response to Peer Review
Thank you for taking the time to respond to our article! We appreciate your kind remarks about the state of the article so far. We're hoping to elaborate on some aspects of Gilchrist's work to make the article more comprehensive and give the reader a better sense of her work. Again, thank you! We hope you're able to read the final product.