User:CrypticNfamous/Net force/Cheeezeus Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CrypticNfamous


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CrypticNfamous/Net_force/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Net force

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content
I think the outlined plan for what to include content-wise is well-rounded and I like how you are focused on finding sources that are more recent. Furthermore, although there is no content in the draft, the sentence added in the outline is informative and does well in expanding upon "rigid bodies".

Tone and Balance
You follow a neutral and informative tone that is appropriate for a wikipedia article, and the sentence provided is well executed in terms of tone and balance. I like that it is concise yet detailed. However a suggest taking a more active voice in your tone. For example, using "in general" at the beginning of the sentence takes a passive voice, and it would be stronger to add "in general" to the end or omit it completely.

Sources and Reference
Sources come from credible websites. This is appropriate for use in a wikipedia article.